- yearly veterinary care, prompt attention for injury or illness
- clean cages
- sufficient space in cages
- proper food
- clean water
- shelter from the elements (it can get very hot and very cold in Missouri)
- exercise
- a break from breeding between heat cycles (no more than two litters in 18 months).
(If you've been living under a rock (or in a very small cage) you might not know that Missouri produces about a third of the puppies born in America.)
Various groups are against this legislation - I've included some of the more interesting comments. Please don't just read the comments out of context, click on a few of the links too.
The Tea Bag Party - "The society (HSUS) seeks only to raise the cost of breeding dogs, making it ever-more difficult for middle-class American families to be dog-owners."
Missouri Federation of Animal Owners - "Our goal has always been and shall always be to protect the rights of animal owners and enthusiasts against the devastating effects of the animal rights movement."
United For Missouri - "... Proposition B is an economic question as well as one of basic liberty."
Missouri Farm Bureau - "HSUS has introduced Proposition B as a means of eliminating the legal, licensed professional dog breeders in Missouri."
Missouri Veterinary Medical Association - "The issue of the Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act has come about because breeding facilities that are unlicensed are not being regulated or inspected."
The Alliance for Truth - "It is not unusual for outside interests to try to impose their will on the people of Missouri."
The American Kennel Club - "... (the provisions in) Missouri Proposition B do absolutely nothing to improve the wellbeing of animals; instead, it would add excessive expenses to responsible breeders who strive to produce well-bred family pets."
Missouri Pet Breeders Association: News - No comment
Personally... well you probably know how I feel about this legislation. I won't try to sway you - yet - just look at the arguments put forth by those who oppose Proposition B. I wanted to give them their day in court, let their side be heard. Next time, I'll discuss each of their positions, as I see them.
(And notice please that I didn't use the emotionally-charged phrase usually associated with this issue. You know the one I mean....)
No comments:
Post a Comment